<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top-Down vs. Bottom-Up Seamless Pullovers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.laylock.org/blog/2010/01/top-down-vs-bottom-up-seamless-pullovers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.laylock.org/blog/2010/01/top-down-vs-bottom-up-seamless-pullovers/</link>
	<description>knitwear design blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 12:33:17 +0200</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Old Notebooks and Story Hooks &#8211; Laylock</title>
		<link>http://www.laylock.org/blog/2010/01/top-down-vs-bottom-up-seamless-pullovers/comment-page-1/#comment-565</link>
		<dc:creator>Old Notebooks and Story Hooks &#8211; Laylock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 15:18:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laylock.org/?p=723#comment-565</guid>
		<description>[...] it&#8217;s on this desk, among a number of odd balls of yarn and a mug of salep. I&#8217;m wearing this jumper and still feeling decidedly chilly. To the shame of my &#8220;All-Star&#8221; sticker, I am in fact [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] it&#8217;s on this desk, among a number of odd balls of yarn and a mug of salep. I&#8217;m wearing this jumper and still feeling decidedly chilly. To the shame of my &#8220;All-Star&#8221; sticker, I am in fact [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Georganna</title>
		<link>http://www.laylock.org/blog/2010/01/top-down-vs-bottom-up-seamless-pullovers/comment-page-1/#comment-531</link>
		<dc:creator>Georganna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 14:57:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laylock.org/?p=723#comment-531</guid>
		<description>Your jumper is lovely and appears to fit so very well. Your diligence certainly paid off! 
I&#039;ve just recently discovered S. Japel and all of her wonderful looking top down patterns.  I have Angelica in my queue and can&#039;t wait to start it.  Thanks for the tips on fit as I&#039;m not a very experienced knitter and still learning something with every new project.
Blessings,
G</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your jumper is lovely and appears to fit so very well. Your diligence certainly paid off!<br />
I&#8217;ve just recently discovered S. Japel and all of her wonderful looking top down patterns.  I have Angelica in my queue and can&#8217;t wait to start it.  Thanks for the tips on fit as I&#8217;m not a very experienced knitter and still learning something with every new project.<br />
Blessings,<br />
G</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: woolcat</title>
		<link>http://www.laylock.org/blog/2010/01/top-down-vs-bottom-up-seamless-pullovers/comment-page-1/#comment-447</link>
		<dc:creator>woolcat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 14:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laylock.org/?p=723#comment-447</guid>
		<description>If the sweater is in stocking stitch, you can knit the body bottom up and the sleeves top-down. I tried it on a sweater for my husband and you can&#039;t see the join; also no grafting at the underarms!

I&#039;m currently doing the top-down Francis Revisited sweater and rather enjoying it, although not too sure about sizing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the sweater is in stocking stitch, you can knit the body bottom up and the sleeves top-down. I tried it on a sweater for my husband and you can&#8217;t see the join; also no grafting at the underarms!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m currently doing the top-down Francis Revisited sweater and rather enjoying it, although not too sure about sizing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linda</title>
		<link>http://www.laylock.org/blog/2010/01/top-down-vs-bottom-up-seamless-pullovers/comment-page-1/#comment-444</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 17:15:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laylock.org/?p=723#comment-444</guid>
		<description>Top down! I made one bottom up sweater but it was before I discovered top down and I will never go back. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Top down! I made one bottom up sweater but it was before I discovered top down and I will never go back. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah</title>
		<link>http://www.laylock.org/blog/2010/01/top-down-vs-bottom-up-seamless-pullovers/comment-page-1/#comment-442</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 22:21:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laylock.org/?p=723#comment-442</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a very handsome sweater! You might like the trick of skipping the ribbed hem and beginning at the stockinet portion with a provisional cast on so that you can come back at the end and knit down to the wanted length -- useful if you think you might run short of yarn, or if you just have my habit of underestimating the length of your torso.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a very handsome sweater! You might like the trick of skipping the ribbed hem and beginning at the stockinet portion with a provisional cast on so that you can come back at the end and knit down to the wanted length &#8212; useful if you think you might run short of yarn, or if you just have my habit of underestimating the length of your torso.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

